Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 182
|
|
1
|
Player / General / Re: Things that Suck
|
on: Today at 06:06:29 AM
|
It's almost summer. The sun is shining, the birds are singing, it's just perfeARGH FUCKING FLIES
Then there's each and every insect, the heat, etc. Winter's better than this torture.
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
Player / Games / Re: Ouya - New Game Console?
|
on: May 24, 2013, 12:12:15 PM
|
As much shit talk as I do about the Ouya, it'll be lovely for you developers to target specific hardware for once, rather than windows (with all their random videocards) or ALL ANDROID DEVICES WITH THEIR RANDOM SHIT RESOLUTIONS AND ASPECT RATIOS.
Resolutions and aspect ratios can vary between tv's, too. So you better take it into account. Between whatever CRTs have, 1280x720 and 1920x1080. A lot fewer to take into account for now compared to the desktop and mobile handheld market.
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
Player / General / Re: Fight Thread Pollution! Post here if it's not worth a new thread!!!
|
on: May 24, 2013, 09:42:21 AM
|
flash is good technically, but the fgl bubble sort of busted/is bursting up and it's a lot more interesting to go for mobile than to try to compete in the flash market. At this point, there is no interest develloping in flash unless you want to make a free web game that is
That and not to mention FlashPunk being dead. And I thought most Flash development was basically for free web games.
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
Player / General / Re: Things that Suck
|
on: May 18, 2013, 09:09:14 AM
|
that sucks
Yeah, luckily most of my webdesign comes straight from paper sketches to HTML/CSS. I only used Photoshop to quickly see how it looks in practice. I never understood how sites generally went from *.PSD directly to *.HTML/*.CSS. Paper-to-code is practically foolproof, albeit with the occasional testing and <div> fixing. I've only tried some PSD -> HTML/CSS once and I didn't really like the outcome. However, Photoshop is a pretty nice tool if you just want to find the right look/style without coding it all first, especially as many of the layer-styles can easily be transferred to CSS3 (border radius, drop shadow, gradient, etc.). Wish the GIMP had layer properties like Photoshop did. It especially would help with following tutorials. GIMP doesn't have layer styles? I've never used GIMP more than 5 minutes, as I found it really hard merging my over 5 years of Photoshop experience onto GIMP, but it sounds like pure hell not having layer properties IMO.  Only attributes a layer really gets besides creating one which decides the layer fill, layer size, and layer name. "Styles" seem to just be done with filters. You probably get used to it after working with it a lot and some filters seem to add whatever it needs to different layers. Photoshop's slow, but its attributes system is unmatched. If the GIMP had it, it would be the greatest thing added since the tools window, the canvas window, and the layers window all merging into one.
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
Player / General / Re: Things that Suck
|
on: May 17, 2013, 06:43:42 PM
|
that sucks
Yeah, luckily most of my webdesign comes straight from paper sketches to HTML/CSS. I only used Photoshop to quickly see how it looks in practice. I never understood how sites generally went from *.PSD directly to *.HTML/*.CSS. Paper-to-code is practically foolproof, albeit with the occasional testing and <div> fixing. I've only tried some PSD -> HTML/CSS once and I didn't really like the outcome. However, Photoshop is a pretty nice tool if you just want to find the right look/style without coding it all first, especially as many of the layer-styles can easily be transferred to CSS3 (border radius, drop shadow, gradient, etc.). Wish the GIMP had layer properties like Photoshop did. It especially would help with following tutorials.
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
Player / General / Re: Things that Suck
|
on: May 17, 2013, 04:26:17 PM
|
that sucks
Yeah, luckily most of my webdesign comes straight from paper sketches to HTML/CSS. I only used Photoshop to quickly see how it looks in practice. I never understood how sites generally went from *.PSD directly to *.HTML/*.CSS. Paper-to-code is practically foolproof, albeit with the occasional testing and <div> fixing.
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
Player / General / Re: Things that Suck
|
on: May 15, 2013, 06:15:27 AM
|
I was also like that in my younger age, so I could relate to what he was thinking.
We all were. No exceptions.
|
|
|
|
|