|
407
|
Player / Games / Re: IndieCade
|
on: May 04, 2009, 12:25:58 PM
|
|
im judging all yo asses again. and maybe entering something too.
BECAUSE YOU CAN DO THAT AT INDIECADE!
|
|
|
|
|
408
|
Feedback / DevLogs / Re: Closure
|
on: April 30, 2009, 07:11:38 AM
|
|
some dude keeps leaving comments about fez everywhere, accusing me of ripping you off. it's pretty funny.
|
|
|
|
|
409
|
Player / General / Re: I am pissed off
|
on: April 30, 2009, 07:06:35 AM
|
|
what pisses me off if how much money programmers make compared to any other discipline.
|
|
|
|
|
412
|
Player / Games / Re: [s]Bob's Game[/s] POKEMAN
|
on: April 28, 2009, 11:03:43 AM
|
One of my biggest problems with Pokemon is that it isn't open-world at all. Even if you're more interested in breeding pokemon, or doing contests, you have no option but to beat the Gym Leaders in order to get everywhere. You should be able to make it through the entire game without having to defeat the Gym Leaders.
absolutely agree. the world is just a series of hubs connected by linear roads. it's super rigid. it should just be a big open map. it's amazing that it isnt when you think about it.
|
|
|
|
|
416
|
Player / Games / Re: [s]Bob's Game[/s] POKEMAN
|
on: April 24, 2009, 02:36:09 PM
|
i was excited about the new one until i realized its just yet another re-hash. nothing's changed since the black and white days except for a few incremental additions like mating and day-night cycles.
i really wish they'd step it up a little. keep the same collection/battle gameplay but you know...bring it into this century.
i like pokemon a lot but i cant justv re-play the same thing over and over again. for 10 years. i want a real sequel.
There where three incremental add ons that I felt really added something. Dark and Steel Pokemon fixed a really big imbalance from Red/Blue, where psychic Pokemon had a massive advantage. Pokemon being able to hold items, because it added a new pre-battle tactical thing. I also liked the beauty contests, if you played hardcore and tried to stick with one team for everything you had to plan your selection of attacks carefully to be good for both. Most of the rest of it was fluff. With the occasional 'oh thats neat' thing. Like the item that lets you re-challenge trainers for twinking easily and the balancing of stat growth to reflect how much you used the Pokemon as well as how you raised it. I definitly can't deal with this 500 stuff they throw around these days. Bring back Pokemon Snap.  [/Pokemon nerd] see, thats what i mean. the only changes they ever made were incredibly technical/hardcore minutiae like that. i dont give a shit if a pokemon can hold an object now. a new edition of the game that does not warrant. just make it a fucking 3D open world already.
|
|
|
|
|
418
|
Player / Games / Re: [s]Bob's Game[/s] POKEMAN
|
on: April 24, 2009, 11:01:10 AM
|
|
i was excited about the new one until i realized its just yet another re-hash. nothing's changed since the black and white days except for a few incremental additions like mating and day-night cycles.
i really wish they'd step it up a little. keep the same collection/battle gameplay but you know...bring it into this century.
i like pokemon a lot but i cant justv re-play the same thing over and over again. for 10 years. i want a real sequel.
|
|
|
|
|