Block stacking game with lasers and rockets...

Reminds me of Meteos.

I don't know if I can anti-vote, but I anti-vote EYE.

Little Big Adventure looks too interesting to pass up. 

Hmm .. 5 seconds is still way too long considering there are options available that are real-time. But i agree with the premise .. 75% less waiting time ( from 20 to 5 seconds ) is already worth it, 99% less ( from 20 to 0.02 seconds ) even more so

I ... you do understand the 5 seconds is because you have to open a file, make the changes, close it, right?  You do understand that we don't have a system yet where you think something and it happens, right?

^ I love those colors, ClayB

I've been doing some color thumbnails.

The only thing is that his body pretty much blends in on the bottom right.  Otherwise, fantastic.

You should hide the existing votes until after people have voted.  Otherwise you are going to wind up anchoring people's price points.

How about instead of instantiating each tree seperately as its own game object, have only one game object which creates a single mesh that contains all trees.

I mean, not quite, but close enough to not really be different.  And he discounted that because he needs children colliders.  Now, he could try a mesh collider, but the use of that is dependent on a lot of things.

Paranoia Agent had really good everything.

1) Who cares if something is perceived as "hardcore" or not?

2) Free to play typically makes me think the game will be a shitty, shameless cashgrab (obviously there are exceptions to the rule, but I'd say it's something like a 10,000:1 ratio of shitty to decent).

And really, this is more of a topic for design or business.

I'm just going to say, if you interpret the comments in this thread as "hating" you are going to have a very tough time making a game.  It requires a pretty thick skin to be able to handle the inevitable criticism that is going to come up (99% of which will be much more "hateful" than the comments in this thread).

It just sort of makes you more durable, in general.  I think that it winds up doubling your health bar, and allowing you to heal 4 health bars at a time if you don't have a health kit.  The only thing that changed how I played was the ability to use a takedown on the heavy enemies.

I'm not sure I have anything to say that allen didn't already say.  I guess I wasn't totally a fan of the leveling up.  Not because I wanted choice in the leveling up, but I guess I don't really see a need for leveling up.  It just serves to make the game easier as you progress, which just cuts the tension.

 The ability to tailor your weapon load-out to your play style worked really well.  The storyline was fine.  I mean, it was horrible and cheesy but it was going for that.  The humor was much more iffy, as they actually tried to be funny and failed most of the time.  I think I smirked like 3 times, and maybe chuckled once. That being said, all in all, I'm very happy for the $15.

Fittingly enough Poe's law means that I can't tell.

Umm...this isn't reddit?

Not as cool as that blog because it's a one-shot and it is also a little old, but this breakdown of Wind Waker is pretty great.

Guys... this game isn't sexist. You can play as a woman killing all the men too.

Sheesh.

I ... are you serious?  Is this a joke?  Or you really that fucking stupid?

EDIT:
*REDACTED*
Yeah, probably went a bit overboard there.

Anyway, I was speaking in specifics, not generalities. Don't take what I say and then straw man it up, Themsalltook.  I understand that there can be unintentional clones (or near clones like SplosionMan and Explodemon), but I think that you are just being willfully ignorant if you sincerely think that this was completely unintentional.

Just to clarify, you can keep xml files named xml.  It's other files (say .oel for ogmo or .plist for cocos2d) that follow xml specs but have a different file extension that Unity doesn't like.

Shouldn't it be something like:

Code:

for(int i = 0; i < 20; i++){
     if(runners[i].hp == 0)  {
       runners[i].die();
     }
     for(int j = 0; j < 20; i++) {
         if(collision(&runnersR[i],&bulletsR[j]))     {
                 bullets[i].yC = 6000;
                 runners[i].hp = 0;
                 cout << "Enemy hit" << endl;
         }
     }
  }

Unless you only want bullet 1 to collide with runner 1?

Also, it would probably help if you actually posted collision(hitbox hb1, hitbox hb2) since that's the important part.

So, the biggest problem with the game so far is one that I feel is inherent of all "parody" games.  To parody a problematic feature of a game, you typically have to emulate it.  This means that if you are parodying something that isn't fun, you have to put something that isn't fun in your game.  I get that the tutorial is short and is a joke, but it is still a shitty way to start the game.