|
Flimgoblin
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: August 12, 2010, 12:29:34 AM » |
|
I have a full time job and two kids and I've made it to MADRIS already :p
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
György Straub
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: August 12, 2010, 03:34:54 AM » |
|
Nice cover, Melly! I always figured voting for yourself was a given.  (But I won't do it this time.) Well, I dunno about the given thing. Times I was pleased with what I've created, I voted for myself. When I wasn't, I didn't. But the more I think about it, the more I reckon that voting for self should not be allowed. I have a full time job and two kids and I've made it to MADRIS already :p
I wants your job. OR your kids. No, the job.   
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Oddball
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: August 12, 2010, 04:33:17 AM » |
|
I'm struggling to play them all because my current Windows setup is giving me a DirectX error with most of the Windows entries. All my drivers are up to date so I don't know what that's all about. Not sure if I'll be able to get hold of another machine before the voting deadline.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dacke
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: August 12, 2010, 04:43:24 AM » |
|
I always figured voting for yourself was a given.  Me too. It is common practice in political elections, where you are supposed to vote for your own party. I see no reason why it would be wrong to vote for yourself, if you think your game is good enough. Either put up a rule saying " don't vote for yourself" or a rule that says " you may vote for yourself". Apparently it doesn't work to assume that everyone reasons the same, without clear instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
vegan • socialist • atheist • humanist • liberal • FOSSer programmer • feminist • animal rights activist • pacifist • teetotaller
|
|
|
|
guillermo
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: August 12, 2010, 07:06:26 AM » |
|
The difference here is that you have 7 votes, also there's no prize, so I don't see why you should vote for yourself. Still I don't think a single vote will really make a difference.
To me these compos are like running a 10k race or something. Is not about beating the others it's about beating yourself in one way or another. Also to have tons of fun.
So spread the votes, it's a given you liked your own game. After all, you spent a lot of time making it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Soulliard
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: August 12, 2010, 06:48:08 PM » |
|
I always figured voting for yourself was a given.  Me too. It is common practice in political elections, where you are supposed to vote for your own party. I see no reason why it would be wrong to vote for yourself, if you think your game is good enough. This is why there should be a rule. Some people will think, "Voting for your own entry is clearly biased. Nobody would ever do that, and neither will I!" Others will think, "Voting for your own entry is expected. If I don't do it, everyone else will and I'll come out behind." Creating a rule bypasses these situations and allows people to vote honestly.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Melly
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: August 12, 2010, 07:08:03 PM » |
|
I'm still not convinced. If people are insecure enough to think their game has no chance if they don't vote for themselves, let them.
Again, no prizes are involved, so I say that you guys should stop thinking so hard into it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Soulliard
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: August 12, 2010, 07:16:20 PM » |
|
But why not at least say in the first post that voting for yourself is frowned upon? It's obvious by your language that you don't approve of it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Melly
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: August 12, 2010, 07:59:48 PM » |
|
I don't approve it, personally, but I also don't care enough about it to force people.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Soulliard
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: August 12, 2010, 08:02:42 PM » |
|
I guess what I'm trying to say is this. It doesn't really matter whether voting for your own game is encouraged or not. All that matters is that it's consistent between different people.
But, whatever. It's not a huge issue.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
MegaLeon
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: August 13, 2010, 02:24:50 AM » |
|
It is possible to view the results without voting?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dacke
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: August 13, 2010, 03:07:50 AM » |
|
What Souliard said.
It just feels unfair to look down at people, who can't possibly know they are doing something wrong. But I think it would be quite sufficient to simply add a small "please don't", to establish a common etiquette.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
vegan • socialist • atheist • humanist • liberal • FOSSer programmer • feminist • animal rights activist • pacifist • teetotaller
|
|
|
miconazole
Level 1
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: August 13, 2010, 03:15:01 AM » |
|
It is possible to view the results without voting? I don't think we can view the results even after voting. Which is as it should be, IMO. Melly, you should put a suggestion to not vote for yourself in the first post, just so everyone's on the same page here.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Flimgoblin
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: August 13, 2010, 03:59:53 AM » |
|
post-vote it only shows what you've voted for, doesn't show results - those will be after it closes I suspect  (which is good - keeps it from influencing people)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Melly
|
 |
« Reply #29 on: August 13, 2010, 09:14:42 AM » |
|
Yeah, results will show once the poll is over. It also keeps people guessing.
Alright, I'll add a note on the first post about common voting etiquette.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|