Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

 
Advanced search

1075821 Posts in 44145 Topics- by 36117 Members - Latest Member: jessicarutch30

December 29, 2014, 08:06:18 AM
TIGSource ForumsPlayerGeneralTV Tropes
Poll
Question: Has TV Tropes ruined your life yet?
Yes it has. THANKS FOR REMINDING ME! - 10 (18.5%)
No, but I've been trapped there for hours on end - 31 (57.4%)
What's TV Tropes? - 13 (24.1%)
Total Voters: 48

Pages: 1 [2]
Print
Author Topic: TV Tropes  (Read 2358 times)
Skofo
Level 10
*****



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: August 22, 2010, 05:52:21 PM »

Quote
weekly column

That'd be horrible. The wiki format works awesomely for TVTropes for the same reason that it works awesomely for Wikipedia. People generally don't want to have a weekly ration of random knowledge that they probably don't even really care about, they want to search for exactly what they want and indulge in it and things related to it as much as they please.
Logged

If you wish to make a video game from scratch, you must first invent the universe.
AMAZON
Level 10
*****



View Profile Email
« Reply #21 on: August 22, 2010, 06:00:35 PM »

a weekly column would be pretty cool as a side thing, where they further delved into the implications of existing tropes, but not as the main site.
Logged

Tycho Brahe
Level 10
*****

λx.x


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: August 23, 2010, 12:21:52 PM »

Quote
weekly column
That'd be horrible. The wiki format works awesomely for TVTropes for the same reason that it works awesomely for Wikipedia. People generally don't want to have a weekly ration of random knowledge that they probably don't even really care about, they want to search for exactly what they want and indulge in it and things related to it as much as they please.
Actually, I've subscribed to the wikipedia daily article thing, and I think its great. It does a little to broaden ones knowlege of stuff one would never look up on ones own.

(I only wrote one so much because I felt dirty writing "they'd never look up on they're own...")
Logged
William Laub
Level 10
*****


Gold Cray


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #23 on: August 23, 2010, 01:05:05 PM »

(I only wrote one so much because I felt dirty writing "they'd never look up on they're own...")
There are a number of proposed genderless personal pronouns. I've been working on assimilating "thon" into my vocabulary.
Logged
SirNiko
Level 10
*****


View Profile Email
« Reply #24 on: August 23, 2010, 01:10:50 PM »

What pronoun does "thon" replace?
Logged
C.A. Silbereisen
Schlagerstar
Global Moderator
Level 10
******


eurovision winner 2014


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: August 23, 2010, 01:19:21 PM »

(I only wrote one so much because I felt dirty writing "they'd never look up on they're own...")
"It does a little to broaden your knowlege of stuff you would never look up on your own."

See, easy as that.

Also, according to the Spelling Gestapo it's "their" not "they're".
Logged

William Laub
Level 10
*****


Gold Cray


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #26 on: August 23, 2010, 01:28:40 PM »

What pronoun does "thon" replace?
It would replace "he" and "she" in any case where gender is not known or specified. Of course, given the current state of the English languages, it probably wouldn't hurt anything to just let "they" serve as both a plural and singular pronoun.
Logged
Tycho Brahe
Level 10
*****

λx.x


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: August 23, 2010, 02:09:15 PM »

"It does a little to broaden your knowlege of stuff you would never look up on your own."
That makes me feel dirty. And wrong. *shudder*
Logged
Phasma Felis
Level 1
*


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: August 23, 2010, 02:44:56 PM »

Funny thing is, there isn't. People manage to comment anyway. You're not supposed to jump into the main pages of tropes sharing anecdotes or whatever, and if you want to correct something, you go in and edit it; no matter how much the site tells people not to, most tropers will just attach some "well, actually..." comment onto the offending sentence.

Also, when giving an example of a trope, tropers have a habit of placing the example with some smarmy comment about how the example should have been on here already, i.e., "Come on, people, <some show nobody has heard of> isn't on here yet? FOR SHAME"

Also, people regularly use hyperlinks to compare themselves to positive tropes (like "Lazy but Brilliant") and, if they're arguing with someone, their opponents to negative tropes ("You Fail Logic Forever").

Those might seem like nitpicks, but given how much the site tries to stop people doing things like that and how irritating it gets after a while, I can't take it. That's why I'm not a big fan of the place.
It's a wiki, yo. Fix that shit! You'll do the world a favor. Smiley

(In their defense, it's only recently that the site has started to crack down on bad writing, and it's gonna take a while to edit out all the outstanding problems. IMHO, there's already been improvement.
Logged
Paint by Numbers
Guest
« Reply #29 on: August 23, 2010, 02:51:47 PM »

It's a wiki, yo. Fix that shit! You'll do the world a favor. Smiley

You're right, man. I'm gonna go there and change this once and for all.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
Print
Jump to:  

Theme orange-lt created by panic