next »

[Dr. Cooldude]

Heh, it was a joke.
But yeah, I also dislike the developing cancer of bad Kickstarter campaigns lately.

[Dr. Cooldude]

Working on the best web design idea in the entire universe

Having a good time designing it on Photoshop

Clicks on "Text" icon in toolbox

Photoshop randomly opens four "Help" pages in the browser

Photoshop says something like "Could not open Online Help" IIRC

I think "What the fuck..." and clicks the text button again

Photoshop crashes

[siskavard]

that sucks

[Dr. Cooldude]

that sucks

Yeah, luckily most of my webdesign comes straight from paper sketches to HTML/CSS. I only used Photoshop to quickly see how it looks in practice.

[Player Ʒ]

that sucks

Yeah, luckily most of my webdesign comes straight from paper sketches to HTML/CSS. I only used Photoshop to quickly see how it looks in practice.

I never understood how sites generally went from *.PSD directly to *.HTML/*.CSS. Paper-to-code is practically foolproof, albeit with the occasional testing and <div> fixing.

[Dr. Cooldude]

that sucks

Yeah, luckily most of my webdesign comes straight from paper sketches to HTML/CSS. I only used Photoshop to quickly see how it looks in practice.

I never understood how sites generally went from *.PSD directly to *.HTML/*.CSS. Paper-to-code is practically foolproof, albeit with the occasional testing and <div> fixing.

I've only tried some PSD -> HTML/CSS once and I didn't really like the outcome. However, Photoshop is a pretty nice tool if you just want to find the right look/style without coding it all first, especially as many of the layer-styles can easily be transferred to CSS3 (border radius, drop shadow, gradient, etc.).

[Player Ʒ]

that sucks

Yeah, luckily most of my webdesign comes straight from paper sketches to HTML/CSS. I only used Photoshop to quickly see how it looks in practice.

I never understood how sites generally went from *.PSD directly to *.HTML/*.CSS. Paper-to-code is practically foolproof, albeit with the occasional testing and <div> fixing.

I've only tried some PSD -> HTML/CSS once and I didn't really like the outcome. However, Photoshop is a pretty nice tool if you just want to find the right look/style without coding it all first, especially as many of the layer-styles can easily be transferred to CSS3 (border radius, drop shadow, gradient, etc.).

Wish the GIMP had layer properties like Photoshop did. It especially would help with following tutorials.

[Dr. Cooldude]

that sucks

Yeah, luckily most of my webdesign comes straight from paper sketches to HTML/CSS. I only used Photoshop to quickly see how it looks in practice.

I never understood how sites generally went from *.PSD directly to *.HTML/*.CSS. Paper-to-code is practically foolproof, albeit with the occasional testing and <div> fixing.

I've only tried some PSD -> HTML/CSS once and I didn't really like the outcome. However, Photoshop is a pretty nice tool if you just want to find the right look/style without coding it all first, especially as many of the layer-styles can easily be transferred to CSS3 (border radius, drop shadow, gradient, etc.).

Wish the GIMP had layer properties like Photoshop did. It especially would help with following tutorials.

GIMP doesn't have layer styles? I've never used GIMP more than 5 minutes, as I found it really hard merging my over 5 years of Photoshop experience onto GIMP, but it sounds like pure hell not having layer properties IMO.

[Player Ʒ]

that sucks

Yeah, luckily most of my webdesign comes straight from paper sketches to HTML/CSS. I only used Photoshop to quickly see how it looks in practice.

I never understood how sites generally went from *.PSD directly to *.HTML/*.CSS. Paper-to-code is practically foolproof, albeit with the occasional testing and <div> fixing.

I've only tried some PSD -> HTML/CSS once and I didn't really like the outcome. However, Photoshop is a pretty nice tool if you just want to find the right look/style without coding it all first, especially as many of the layer-styles can easily be transferred to CSS3 (border radius, drop shadow, gradient, etc.).

Wish the GIMP had layer properties like Photoshop did. It especially would help with following tutorials.

GIMP doesn't have layer styles? I've never used GIMP more than 5 minutes, as I found it really hard merging my over 5 years of Photoshop experience onto GIMP, but it sounds like pure hell not having layer properties IMO.

Only attributes a layer really gets besides creating one which decides the layer fill, layer size, and layer name. "Styles" seem to just be done with filters. You probably get used to it after working with it a lot and some filters seem to add whatever it needs to different layers. Photoshop's slow, but its attributes system is unmatched. If the GIMP had it, it would be the greatest thing added since the tools window, the canvas window, and the layers window all merging into one.

[Gimym TILBERT]

No soft have layer style beside photoshop.

[siskavard]

that tru

[Blambo]

need dat default drop shadow 4 kool effekt

[siskavard]

comic sans plz