next »

[Hideous]

I need another mirror or something. It refuses to download.

[William Broom]

Alternate mirror now available.

[Hideous]

"~~~~~~~~~~" was a really boring level.

"Hideous" gave me almost 5000 points though :D

[Pip]

Hypnotic.

[Alex May]

its funny. i went to a psy trance bush rave full moon party a few weeks ago called diaspora

Diaspora = "the movement, migration or scattering of people from their original homelands" usually used refering to the "Jewish Diaspora" where they left what is today Israel LONG ago

So I get the "spore" and perhaps the idea that they'd be scattering, but I definatedely don't get the party.

I would hazard a guess that it's a sort of escape theme present in a ton of these kinds of party. People giving up normal society's rules and stuff and meeting like minds out in the desert.

[William Broom]

I've done some more work on the game, it now has quite a few new movement styles and events, the spores might follow each other, turn invisible, level up and more. I also have a more balanced scoring system that divides the score by the time spent instead of subtracting. It's still weighted towards seeds that produce lots of spores, but not as much as it used to be.

Next I'm going to implement planetoids with spherical gravity, and then maybe released an updated demo.

Also, I thought about giving the player a ship that can be hit by spores, but I decided against it, since it would make the game a lot less unique. Also, some seeds would be almost impossible to dodge while others would be pushovers.

[jph wacheski]

So I get the "spore" and perhaps the idea that they'd be scattering, but I definatedely don't get the party.

I would hazard a guess that it's a sort of escape theme present in a ton of these kinds of party. People giving up normal society's rules and stuff and meeting like minds out in the desert.

yeah diaspora is form 'scattering of seeds',. and the current usage of 'scatterings of peoples' seems to lend it self to a psy-trance rave,. . people come together for a pary and then take the seeds of culture with them and spread it!

found a cool blog searcing the term: http://beatdiaspora.blogspot.com/2007_11_01_archive.html 

[increpare]

Hypnotic.

Woah that is a good one

this game plays really well I think   you going to add many more types of particle dynamics you think?

[William Broom]

New demo on first post 

[FishyBoy]

It's pretty cool. It's pretty cool, figuring out the physics behind each level. I got a score of 412 on "argh", which is deceptively easy.

Only problem is that I didn't see gravity wells very often. Maybe more elements like that would be cool.

[William Broom]

Yeah I do find that gravity wells don't crop up as much as I'd like. That's easy to fix though.

[Sar]

Also: the box asking for the name at the end of the level defaults to the value of the seed... couldn't it default to whatever you used as your name last time?

While a couple of the new behaviours are fun, I find that more of the seeds I try this time result in un-fun games than with the first demo, and in its current state that's the main undoing of the game. Chasing down the last couple of tiny dots just gets tedious.

So I tried something else, instead. 'hello' as a seed gets you a good point-scoring opportunity; I can usually get 4000 points without trying. I notice with this second demo, that some of the time, if you leave the dots long enough they grow into bigger dots. So I tried leaving a few dots alive on 'hello', and letting them grow into bigger dots, and then breaking them down into the smallest dots, letting them grow into bigger dots... my score peaked around 1.5million, by which point I couldn't actually clear the screen 'cause one of the gravity wells had helpfully wandered off the side of the screen so the dots were flailing wildly all over the place and reproducing like crazy.

So I tried again, being a little more conservative this time and letting only a couple of small dots grow again at a time, and by the time I cleared the last dot I was on a healthy 60k... only the game didn't end. I sat there and watched it until it got down to double-digit points just in case there were some of those flashing-in-and-out dots for some reason, but no - nothing.

On the other hand, I'd be a little worried about the growing-the-dots mechanic. I found one seed ('Bichatse') which had growing-the-dots and just simple gravity towards the bottom of the screen... so I could pop them all to small dots, wait for them to grow to medium dots, pop them all to small dots again, repeat ad nauseum. I got my score up to 80k in a couple of rounds, before deciding I'd proved my point (and being annoyed at the slowdown that thousands of the little balls on the screen at once brought) and cleared them, and... again, the game didn't end. If there's some mechanic which causes that then I'd decribe that as terrible, 'cause from the user's point of view the game appears broken. :/

Personally, I'd be tempted to remove the growing-dots entirely. It's kind of cool, in that it allows for runaway scenes like I had the first time I tried it on 'hello', with so many large dots on-screen I couldn't hope to clear them all... but it seems it also opens the door to patience-rather-than-skill highscore climbing. :/

[zradick]

I liked the multiple backgrounds, dot colors, and movement patterns.  Some of the backgrounds worked better than others, though.  With a seed of "foo", the background was pretty painful to look at and I had a hard time tracking the dots against it.  Perhaps using slightly more muted colors for the background would help in some cases.  An interesting use of PCG, though!
Cheers,
--Zack

[William Broom]

From near the start, I never expected the scoring system to be balanced. Some seeds are better than others, and (now) some seeds can be farmed for potentially infinite scores.
However, the other problems, like the gravity wells leaving the screen and the spores doing likewise (I assume this is why the game didn't end) are a real problem that I'll try to fix soon.
As for the level-up power, I might scrap it or make it so that they will only ever level up once per game.
The backgrounds I will also try to make easier on the eyes.
One more thing, Sar - when you say that less enjoyable games have become more likely in the second demo, which ones do you mean exactly? Any styles that people don't enjoy, I can remove or make less frequent.

[Sar]

From near the start, I never expected the scoring system to be balanced.

It would seem rather unreasonable to expect the scoring system to be balanced! It just seems a little silly to have seeds which could potentially have infinitely-high scores, when most seeds have a theoretical maximum.

(Although realistically I kind of suspect the exponential rate score degradation combined with the fixed-max-period player shot probably result in a theoretical maximum score even with as many dots on-screen as you like. For example, I couldn't get significantly more than (IIRC) 1.8 million when I had a screen packed with big dots on 'hello', running at one or two frames per second 'cause of the sheer number of dots, and the final score would have dropped below that by the time I cleaned everything up anyway, if I'd managed to and it worked.)

One more thing, Sar - when you say that less enjoyable games have become more likely in the second demo, which ones do you mean exactly? Any styles that people don't enjoy, I can remove or make less frequent.

Well. It might be somewhat subjective; I found the following things 'fun':
- Large numbers of small dots
- Predictable but not straightforward dot behaviours (e.g. gravity, oscillations)
- Patterns which don't scatter too widely

Basically I get the idea that a good way to score points is to catch dots which move into the area you've 'shot' after your shot-area is already extant, so that's what I try to do... and the above make it possible but also not straightforward to do that, so I can have the reinforcing encouragement that I can do better by better predicting the dot paths, and give me a nice lot of dots to do so with.

I find the following things 'not fun':
- Small numbers of small dots
- Unpredictable or hard-to-predict dot behaviours
- Cleaning up small numbers of dots which have flung themselves so widely it's not possible to catch more than one or two at a time

Small numbers of dots mean that the stage is over very quickly and there are very few opportunities to score points, meaning in turn that there's less variation in score between a 'good' run and an 'excellent' run. Hard-to-predict behaviours (e.g. the ones which suddenly radically change direction) mean I'm wasting too many shots placing it in the path of dots which suddenly stop going in that direction. Cleaning up the scattered remnants is just generally boring.

It just seemed that with this latest demo, more of the seeds I tried ended up with a small number of widely-scattered dots, meaning few opportunities to score and thus a small range of scores, and thus no real feel that playing the level again and again I'm improving. Also a higher number of the erratic-movement dots, which feel 'unfair' the first couple of times - I'll line up shots which look like they should score well when I click the mouse button which end up getting 0 because all the dots have suddenly switched direction.