|
cure
|
 |
« Reply #16860 on: February 12, 2012, 12:09:24 AM » |
|
love this, great way to counter the hordes of over-sexualized boob bounce animations out there. would be even cooler if the boobs flopped around more independently.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Gauss Jordan
|
 |
« Reply #16861 on: February 12, 2012, 03:52:00 AM » |
|
45 deg mockups, it's the new thing! 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Lefty-concepty, righty-pixley, but bothey programmey.
|
|
|
|
Kevin
|
 |
« Reply #16862 on: February 12, 2012, 04:11:57 AM » |
|
This is great news for anyone with torticollis!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Ashkin
|
 |
« Reply #16863 on: February 12, 2012, 10:35:54 AM » |
|
45 deg mockups, it's the new thing!
Constantly rotating game! Can you fight off the bear, or will you succumb to motion sickness first? By all rights, I don't feel like this should be good. It feels like it defies a lot of basic pixel art rules. However, something about it just seems to transcend all of that and come together into a pretty cool style. I suggest dropping the pure black for dark areas, though. It needs refinement, but there's still something attractive abut it that I can't quite put my finger on.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bones
|
 |
« Reply #16864 on: February 12, 2012, 03:10:14 PM » |
|
 Pixel doodle
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Demo Reel 2012Sit down and relax, Keeping focus on your breath, This may take a while.  
|
|
|
|
narasu
|
 |
« Reply #16865 on: February 12, 2012, 04:54:27 PM » |
|
By all rights, I don't feel like this should be good. It feels like it defies a lot of basic pixel art rules. However, something about it just seems to transcend all of that and come together into a pretty cool style. I suggest dropping the pure black for dark areas, though. It needs refinement, but there's still something attractive abut it that I can't quite put my finger on.
I agree with this. There's a whole bunch of established rules in the realm of pixel art, anatomy and perspective that this piece simply defies ass-first, but it's still a great piece. It's got a kind of charm that you can't get around
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BlueSweatshirt
|
 |
« Reply #16866 on: February 12, 2012, 05:38:00 PM » |
|
If art had rules it would be a science, so fuck off.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
namragog
|
 |
« Reply #16867 on: February 12, 2012, 06:09:15 PM » |
|
If art had rules it would be a science, so fuck off.
There are so many ways that this isn't true.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Namragog. I love you. Be creepy forever. 
|
|
|
|
BlueSweatshirt
|
 |
« Reply #16868 on: February 12, 2012, 06:24:10 PM » |
|
Yeah you're right, that comparison to science was awfully unfounded.
However, I think it's very very silly to consider "rules" with art. Guidelines? Sure, of course. But standing there going "wow this breaks every rule but still looks good", well hmmmmmmm. Maybe it's not doing anything "wrong". The mindset of "art should be composed within these rules" is pretty unfoundedly restricting.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
peanutbuttershoes
|
 |
« Reply #16869 on: February 12, 2012, 06:57:24 PM » |
|
pixel art isn't art.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Ashkin
|
 |
« Reply #16870 on: February 12, 2012, 07:33:22 PM » |
|
pixel art isn't art.
Here we go again, folks.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
John Sandoval
|
 |
« Reply #16871 on: February 12, 2012, 07:34:58 PM » |
|
how caer aout the graphic
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Andy Wolff
|
 |
« Reply #16872 on: February 12, 2012, 07:52:27 PM » |
|
art isn't art unless arty arterson (esq.) artapproves itart
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Gabriel Verdon
|
 |
« Reply #16873 on: February 12, 2012, 07:58:03 PM » |
|
FUCK
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Zack Bell
|
 |
« Reply #16874 on: February 12, 2012, 08:20:06 PM » |
|
"Hey look, tons of new posts in the pixel thread!  " Wait... 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|