Oh my god that one is so twee! I am actually amused! These days that sort of thing is relegated to chocolate boxes and biscuit tins.
I would have to agree. I find this sort of devoid of passion, though the artists were clearly very technically skilled.
Enough! There is no more point to talk with retards. Anyone who can see a work like this:
http://employees.oneonta.edu/farberas/arth/Images/110images/sl13_images/Bernini_pluto.jpgor
http://www.artrenewal.org/pages/artwork.php?artworkid=52And say that it is "devoid of passion" is a subhuman faggot that has no sense of place or humility to the masters. Nothing more than a mentally retarded adults who can't understand humor, so they can only laugh when the screen tells them to. So yeah, praise Picasso or Pollock or whatever your social game tells you to, once the renewal comes back in full swing, you will be back to the same place as the ones who crushed Rembrandt -- nothing more than a vile con-artists deserving only the footnote in history.
As they say, you can lead a retard to water, but you can't make them drink.
And it is my standard you moron, although I picked them in relatively short amount of time. Still, between Pollock and that? No question.
Taste is subjective, there is room for disagreements between experts, but not between fagots and me.
Edit: clearing a few things.
Player
