next »

[SirNiko]

The thing about Obama's birthplace being debatable (whether he really was born in the US) I don't get. It'd be easy enough to prove/disprove with a simple DNA test.

How?

Just test his DNA for Hawaii.

Yeah, that's what I meant.

Even if you could prove it via a DNA test, it's simple enough to claim the test was rigged. That's the funny thing about conspiracies - the more you try to disprove them, the more you realize you can't be certain about anything ever, save that you witness firsthand through your own senses.

And even THAT can sometimes be misleading (eg. sleight of hand).

[Seth]

Sounds creepy.  

Got any Wikipedia link or anything where I can read more on the subject? Couldn't seem to find anything on Google.

Hah, as if the feds would openly let the public know about that stuff!

...plus, I was just kidding.  That doesn't really happen here.

[C.A. Silbereisen]

    

[fraxcell]

The thing about Obama's birthplace being debatable (whether he really was born in the US) I don't get.

I don't understand this either. His birth in Hawaii is pretty well documented
Birth Certificate
Wikipedia

Although since he has refused to take those DNA tests we will never really know.

[Lon]

The thing about Obama's birthplace being debatable (whether he really was born in the US) I don't get.

I don't understand this either. His birth in Hawaii is pretty well documented
Birth Certificate
Wikipedia

Although since he has refused to take those DNA tests we will never really know.

At the bottom of the Birth Certificate it says "ANY ALTERATIONS INVALIDATE THIS CERTIFICATE".
Certificate number is censored.
Thus that is an invalid birth certificate.

Wikipedia is not an admissible source to cite in academia.


Things are designed to fail right after their warranty expires.
In reality, I think the warranty is designed to expire immediately before before the majority of devices experience failures.