|
SirNiko
|
 |
« Reply #2205 on: November 10, 2010, 06:00:30 PM » |
|
Somebody needs to post an appropriate image macro thing now, I feel. Until then I don't think the rebuilding can begin, one edge at a time.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
supershigi
|
|
« Reply #2206 on: November 10, 2010, 06:38:53 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
googoogjoob
Level 2
The Walrus is me.
|
|
« Reply #2207 on: November 11, 2010, 07:26:12 AM » |
|
Somebody needs to post an appropriate image macro thing now, I feel. Until then I don't think the rebuilding can begin, one edge at a time.
 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bento_smile
Guest
|
|
« Reply #2208 on: November 11, 2010, 07:58:44 AM » |
|
Hoorah!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bood_War
|
|
« Reply #2209 on: November 11, 2010, 05:12:17 PM » |
|
And thus, he fades
back to obscurity.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Groktar the DestroyerYour mother's a communist.
|
|
|
|
C.A. Sinner
|
|
« Reply #2210 on: November 11, 2010, 05:20:01 PM » |
|
Indie devs have lost their favorite bogeyman. I'm sensing a massive power vacuum here.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Mipe
|
|
« Reply #2211 on: November 12, 2010, 06:26:30 AM » |
|
Don't worry, there is still Bobby Kotick.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Knudsen
|
|
« Reply #2212 on: November 12, 2010, 07:26:26 AM » |
|
I'm a bit confused. Isn't this just abandonment of the "EDGE" mark? What about the rest of his "family" of trademarks? Are they considered part of the "EDGE" mark?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Oddball
|
|
« Reply #2213 on: November 12, 2010, 07:40:36 AM » |
|
He currently still has all the others. And remember this is only the US trademark, his european trademarks are unaffected.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Knudsen
|
|
« Reply #2214 on: November 12, 2010, 08:09:48 AM » |
|
That's what I figured/feared. So did he abandon this specific trademark himself, or did the USPTO cancel it (and only this specific one) based on the court order?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Oddball
|
|
« Reply #2215 on: June 16, 2011, 11:48:29 AM » |
|
So you thought this was all over when Langdell had is US trademark cancelled? You were wrong. Future publishing has now laid the smack down on poor old Timmy for his UK trademark. Full story - http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2011/06/16/tim-langdell-loses-in-future-edge-trial/What I find amazing is that Future Publishing had already coughed up $275,000 to Langdell without offering any resistance. Just shows how lucrative his scam has been. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Μarkham
|
|
« Reply #2216 on: June 16, 2011, 01:55:14 PM » |
|
There's only one hope for Langell now.
He must unleash his true power by performing the Buscaglia Boogie!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Jasper Byrne
|
|
« Reply #2217 on: June 16, 2011, 03:50:59 PM » |
|
I don't get why he wasn't actually forced to repay the money to Future / other scam-ees (or more likely take some time in the nick as the cash is long gone?) Kinda surprises me that he just walks away after all the people he's screwed!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Knudsen
|
|
« Reply #2218 on: June 16, 2011, 11:44:54 PM » |
|
This guy's web of lies never ceases to amaze me! And, like it was said in the RPS article, I can't believe he's not being charged with being in contempt of court or outright perjury. Can you really lie all you want in court without any direct consequences?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Nix
|
|
« Reply #2219 on: June 17, 2011, 08:45:41 AM » |
|
What's his degree in? Is he actually Dr.?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Player
