|
Melly
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: August 23, 2008, 04:06:57 PM » |
|
You don't want to know.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
handCraftedRadio
The Ultimate Samurai
Level 10
|
|
« Reply #21 on: August 23, 2008, 04:08:31 PM » |
|
Am I the only one who uses firefox 1?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Annabelle Kennedy
Awesomesauce
Level 8
♥Android Love♥
|
|
« Reply #22 on: August 23, 2008, 04:13:36 PM » |
|
firefox 3.. makes it horrible..
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
battlerager
|
|
« Reply #23 on: August 23, 2008, 04:15:54 PM » |
|
Firefox makes anything horrible.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
handCraftedRadio
The Ultimate Samurai
Level 10
|
|
« Reply #24 on: August 23, 2008, 04:17:58 PM » |
|
Huh? I don't see anything wrong with anything posted so far.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Inane
|
|
« Reply #25 on: August 23, 2008, 04:18:58 PM » |
|
Hahaha. I'm still on Firefox 2. :D
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
real art looks like the mona lisa or a halo poster and is about being old or having your wife die and sometimes the level goes in reverse
|
|
|
deadeye
First Manbaby Home
Level 10
|
|
« Reply #26 on: August 23, 2008, 04:52:30 PM » |
|
firefox 3.. makes it horrible..
Yep, and there doesn't seem to be any way to turn off the image interpolation. Funny thing is, I've read that IE supports a CSS rule to bypass interpolation, but Firefox doesn't And here I thought Firefox was supposed to be the most compliant browser around or whatever. Edit: Sent to Firefox feedback: Since upgrading to Firefox 3 I've discovered that image interpolation on stretched images is forced to bicubic. This is not always an acceptable solution when rendering images, as it can create rather ugly blurring on certain types of images.
There is currently no way to change this in the config. Also, Internet Explorer supports a CSS rule to change the interpolation mode of stretched images, and Firefox doesn't (msInterpolationMode).
If at all possible could you please allow the default image interpolation to be altered in the config, and also support the same CSS rule that IE does. I've always enjoyed the fact that Firefox is the most compliant and flexible browser, and I'm dismayed that IE offers a solution where Firefox has none. This seems to me an oversight that should be addressed.
Thank you for your time.
It's only a matter of time before they fix it now, obviously my opinion is very important to them. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: August 23, 2008, 05:10:10 PM by deadeye »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
increpare
Guest
|
|
« Reply #27 on: August 23, 2008, 05:00:32 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
shinygerbil
Blew Blow (Loved It)
Level 10
GET off your horse
|
|
« Reply #28 on: August 23, 2008, 05:02:55 PM » |
|
Creepy. also, YOU STILL HAVE THAT PIXEL IN YOUR AVATAR, INCREPARE  O_O, that crazy URL works |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
olücæbelel
|
|
|
handCraftedRadio
The Ultimate Samurai
Level 10
|
|
« Reply #29 on: August 23, 2008, 05:05:55 PM » |
|
Oh and by the way topic starter qubodup, if thats even your real "name", our spam bot doesn't suck. Smithy is the best spambot this world has ever seen, and I'm not just going to sit here in my computer chair while you're going around starting insulting topics about him.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
increpare
Guest
|
|
« Reply #30 on: August 23, 2008, 05:18:22 PM » |
|
Creepy. Yeah. Partially obscuring any part of it makes the rest look like low-res porn, if you ask me. also, YOU STILL HAVE THAT PIXEL IN YOUR AVATAR, INCREPARE
Well where was I supposed to put it?! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mjau
|
|
« Reply #31 on: August 23, 2008, 07:38:34 PM » |
|
Huh? I don't see anything wrong with anything posted so far.
I don't know what OS you're at, but it's only a problem with the Windows version for some reason. Opera is a good alternative. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Melly
|
|
« Reply #32 on: August 23, 2008, 08:44:24 PM » |
|
He isn't really doing his job though. That damn slacker.
Of course he is. He's just so good you don't accuse him of being a spambot. He's so good a bot that you don't even notice him spamming all over your ass, until it's too late, that is. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
moi
|
|
« Reply #33 on: August 23, 2008, 08:46:36 PM » |
|
YES!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
subsystems subsystems subsystems
|
|
|
|
qubodup
|
|
« Reply #34 on: August 24, 2008, 06:16:00 AM » |
|
Jebus Fondling Christina.
So whom to talk to about the soap bot?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Smithy
|
|
« Reply #35 on: August 24, 2008, 08:17:09 AM » |
|
Hello and greetings from humble farmerman!
To make simple: I has live in country USA many year now and seek things to burn for firewood that I do not afford! My friend and goat Yalig need keep warm for sickness.
Is there any good books for burning that you has know of?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Smithy
|
|
« Reply #36 on: August 24, 2008, 08:26:04 AM » |
|
Oh and by the way topic starter qubodup, if thats even your real "name", our spam bot doesn't suck. Smithy is the best spambot this world has ever seen, and I'm not just going to sit here in my computer chair while you're going around starting insulting topics about him. He isn't really doing his job though. That damn slacker. Was secretly out this week fighting justice with Tamer. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
qubodup
|
|
« Reply #37 on: August 24, 2008, 12:45:53 PM » |
|
So could you instead of some cryptic message maybe write "Our anti-spambot is so dumb, it thinks you're a spam bot. I'm afraid you'll have to change some of the words you used in your post... :("
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Corpus
Guest
|
|
« Reply #38 on: August 25, 2008, 11:27:17 AM » |
|
Anti-spambot bot seems a more appropriate name than anti-spambot.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Melly
|
|
« Reply #39 on: August 25, 2008, 12:33:18 PM » |
|
The problem is that I think Derek has no idea how to change that list of words that can't be typed. Or doesn't want to, for one reason or another.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Player
