|
louisdeb
|
 |
« on: September 06, 2012, 11:39:56 AM » |
|
Hi, my name's Louis and I thought I might as well offer what I can to everyone on this forum. So if you need any proofreading done (e.g. you're not English but want to make an English game) then get in touch and I'll do what I can. If you're dialogue is massive then I can't promise I will be quick, but every weekend (and also on bus trips) I'll sit down with the text and work through it. Contact me via a PM on here, or (what will most likely get you a fast response) email me at: [email protected]Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Knudsen
|
|
« Reply #1 on: September 06, 2012, 11:53:07 AM » |
|
"your" not "you're"  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
MoritzPGKatz
|
|
« Reply #2 on: September 06, 2012, 11:55:51 AM » |
|
"your" not "you're" Ouch... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Wilson Saunders
|
|
« Reply #3 on: September 06, 2012, 12:21:49 PM » |
|
Actually "you're" is correct in this instance because the author is abbreviating "you are".
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
MoritzPGKatz
|
|
« Reply #4 on: September 06, 2012, 12:28:19 PM » |
|
Actually "you're" is correct in this instance because the author is abbreviating "you are".
"If you are dialogue is massive"? Don't think so... Happens to me all the time though... I'm sure Louis will be more vigilant with the texts he's sent. And hey, it's free, right? Cheers, Moritz |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
trurkowski
|
|
« Reply #5 on: September 06, 2012, 12:53:18 PM » |
|
Actually "you're" is correct in this instance because the author is abbreviating "you are".
"If you are dialogue is massive"? Don't think so... Happens to me all the time though... I'm sure Louis will be more vigilant with the texts he's sent. And hey, it's free, right? Cheers, Moritz "Two" clarify there are "two" instances of you're, first is correct and the second; incorrect. Yay for things! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
zalzane
|
|
« Reply #6 on: September 06, 2012, 01:09:23 PM » |
|
Actually "you're" is correct in this instance because the author is abbreviating "you are".
"If you are dialogue is massive"? Don't think so... Happens to me all the time though... I'm sure Louis will be more vigilant with the texts he's sent. And hey, it's free, right? Cheers, Moritz I'm sure Louis will be more vigilant with the texts he's going to sent. I assume your original use of he's was intended to be a conjunction between he and has, but "Louis will be more vigilant with the texts he has sent" makes no sense because you're mixing present tense (will) and past tense (has). |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ஒழுக்கின்மை (Paul Eres)
|
|
« Reply #7 on: September 06, 2012, 01:10:42 PM » |
|
if your going to offer to proofread make sure you proofread you're own post
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
trurkowski
|
|
« Reply #8 on: September 06, 2012, 01:13:15 PM » |
|
Actually "you're" is correct in this instance because the author is abbreviating "you are".
"If you are dialogue is massive"? Don't think so... Happens to me all the time though... I'm sure Louis will be more vigilant with the texts he's sent. And hey, it's free, right? Cheers, Moritz I'm sure Louis will be more vigilant with the texts he's going to sent. I assume your original use of he's was intended to be a conjunction between he and has, but "Louis will be more vigilant with the texts he has sent" makes no sense because you're mixing present tense (will) and past tense (has). I'm sure Louis will be more vigilant with the texts he's going to send.Holy carp this is tow hilarious. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
zalzane
|
|
« Reply #9 on: September 06, 2012, 01:15:05 PM » |
|
FUCK how did I miss that. Holy carp this is tow hilarious. Holy crap this is tow hilarious. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
trurkowski
|
|
« Reply #10 on: September 06, 2012, 01:21:22 PM » |
|
FUCK how did I miss that. Holy carp this is tow hilarious. Holy crap this is tow hilarious. Holy crap this is two hilarious. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
moi
|
|
« Reply #11 on: September 06, 2012, 01:23:08 PM » |
|
if your going to offer to proofread make sure you proofread you're own post
AHA oh wOW! like two mistakes in one sentence dude. I hope alternate dreamers has better text than that... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
subsystems subsystems subsystems
|
|
|
|
MoritzPGKatz
|
|
« Reply #12 on: September 06, 2012, 01:25:29 PM » |
|
I'm sure Louis will be more vigilant with the texts he's going to send.
Hehe, I'm not a native speaker, so occasionally these small grammar mistakes slip in. Let me correct that: He will be more vigilant checking the texts sent to him. That's what I was trying to say by "the texts he is sent". |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Soundhound
|
|
« Reply #13 on: September 07, 2012, 03:58:51 AM » |
|
Oh god, the grammar Nazis... they're( ) coming!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
louisdeb
|
|
« Reply #14 on: September 07, 2012, 08:08:47 AM » |
|
Well this is ironic.
Obviously Id proofread texts before sending them, that's what I'm offering
(oh and that one was intended)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
louisdeb
|
|
« Reply #15 on: September 07, 2012, 09:21:16 AM » |
|
y do i feel like i need two check everything before i post in this thread.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Soundhound
|
|
« Reply #16 on: September 07, 2012, 10:55:43 AM » |
|
y do i feel like i need two check everything before i post in this thread.
I hope that's deliberate irony...  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
louisdeb
|
|
« Reply #17 on: September 07, 2012, 12:01:39 PM » |
|
Indeed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Soundhound
|
|
« Reply #18 on: September 07, 2012, 12:10:43 PM » |
|
Ah, well done.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Pandara_RA!
Level 6
Maximum Friendship All Day
|
|
« Reply #19 on: September 22, 2012, 11:41:39 AM » |
|
I'm very happy with the outcome of this thread.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
