TIGSource Forums

Developer => Art => Topic started by: Craig Stern on September 20, 2009, 06:46:07 AM



Title: Photo to 3D
Post by: Craig Stern on September 20, 2009, 06:46:07 AM
I just found this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuHJUS2olyc&fmt=18) on Youtube; there's a program out there where you can load a series of photographs and have it generate a cloud of points, from which you can generate 3D meshes. I think it's kind of amazing:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuHJUS2olyc&fmt=18

Just curious: has anybody tried this technique before?


Title: Re: Photo to 3D
Post by: Bree on September 20, 2009, 07:08:31 AM
Apart from the fact that you'll need over 400 photos to make it work, that is absolutely incredible.


Title: Re: Photo to 3D
Post by: Jrsquee on September 20, 2009, 06:01:37 PM
time to try this


Title: Re: Photo to 3D
Post by: Halcyon on September 20, 2009, 09:18:11 PM
Do show the results. ;)

Very awesome indeed, though I wonder how time consuming it is.


Title: Re: Photo to 3D
Post by: agj on September 23, 2009, 12:22:32 PM
That is quite something. I wonder, can the software read the correct position of the pictures automatically? If so, it'd be so easy to just grab a camera and use 'continuous shooting' while circling around the subject.


Title: Re: Photo to 3D
Post by: havchr on September 25, 2009, 04:37:06 AM
So.. build a stick with multiple cam-corders pointing in different directions. Record while you walking around for a bit. Pipe frames from video into photosynth.
Out comes a 3d scan of the environment you walked around in.
Kinda nice :)


Title: Re: Photo to 3D
Post by: Eclipse on September 25, 2009, 11:47:58 AM
well you'll end up having an unusable 3d mesh.. or at least usable just like the Stanford bunny, but it's a nice piece of software indeed


Title: Re: Photo to 3D
Post by: Zaknafein on September 25, 2009, 12:01:31 PM
I'm kinda bummed out to see that they didn't use texture information! If they could extract depth, certainly they can generate a texture out of all the photographic information.
It wouldn't be easy (different resolutions and projection planes for each photo), but it has to be possible, and it would be awesome...