muku
|
|
« Reply #60 on: October 17, 2008, 06:30:46 PM » |
|
Anyway, I wanted to just toss in my five cents and quietly inquire if anyone feels like writing up a tutorial on writing C++ code that allows someone to extract stuff from a layer in a PSD files (much like one would do with a sprite sheet). DrPetter has done something similar to this in the past a couple of times, and seeing how I have Photoshop 6 handy... You might be able to salvage something from this program here: http://telegraphics.com.au/svn/psdparse/trunk/ (check the readme)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ElTipejoLoco
|
|
« Reply #61 on: October 17, 2008, 10:13:22 PM » |
|
That's a great find, thanks! I'm reading through it right now, and it seems pretty good so far. I'm seeing a lot of stuff I don't recognize, but I assume it's because this code is being made with Mac compatibility in mind. Trying to figure out on my own if there's a way to skip the file generation and simply make the program display the layers' contents within the game, effectively making it so that a possibly small PSD file can serve as an entire sprite sheet. Seems to be proving to be more trouble than its worth, however, on my end (not to mention that PSD files are usually not really smaller than GIF/PNG files). I'm having loads of fun reading through this, however. I'm also quietly reading up on SDL and Allegro, though the programmer in me wants to jump the gun and make his own graphics and game engines.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Currently brainstorming for a project
|
|
|
Xion
|
|
« Reply #62 on: October 17, 2008, 10:41:31 PM » |
|
storytelling:
I'd be interested in these as well.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
muku
|
|
« Reply #63 on: October 18, 2008, 05:43:20 AM » |
|
I'm also quietly reading up on SDL and Allegro, though the programmer in me wants to jump the gun and make his own graphics and game engines.
SDL and Allegro are just relatively low-level graphics/multimedia libraries. Trust me, if you start with them, there's still more than enough work to be done until you have a working game engine, so opportunity for buffing your programmer's pride is plenty :D
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
increpare
Guest
|
|
« Reply #64 on: October 18, 2008, 08:27:06 AM » |
|
SDL and Allegro are just relatively low-level graphics/multimedia libraries. Trust me, if you start with them, there's still more than enough work to be done until you have a working game engine, so opportunity for buffing your programmer's pride is plenty :D
Yeah. Essentially the difference between SDL/Allegro and something like DirectX complexity-wise is pretty slim (at least it has been in my experience). They work at about the same level in terms of game structuring. The main difference is the ostensible cross-platformness.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ElTipejoLoco
|
|
« Reply #65 on: October 18, 2008, 11:40:03 AM » |
|
SDL and Allegro are just relatively low-level graphics/multimedia libraries. Trust me, if you start with them, there's still more than enough work to be done until you have a working game engine, so opportunity for buffing your programmer's pride is plenty :D
Hooray! That still leaves me with the small problem of "ackpth how do I use them again?" The only reason I'd want to write from scratch is so that I know exactly why what is where (a question I call 'whaeh?'). Yeah. Essentially the difference between SDL/Allegro and something like DirectX complexity-wise is pretty slim (at least it has been in my experience). They work at about the same level in terms of game structuring. The main difference is the ostensible cross-platformness.
Sadly, I have probably even less of an idea of how to use DirectX. I'm relatively (incredibly) new to programming anything that isn't purely command prompt based (or made for something that would be Interactive Fiction), and I feel that my writing style isn't really that... immersive (I'm too sarcastic and more often than not break the fourth wall with an iron-fisted super charged with some sort of Zeus-like electricity). Also, I make up words and descriptions on the spot, and tend to make them too zany to understand. All that aside, I may enter the Commonplace Book compo with a small game based on ideas 150 and 155. No guarantees on the results. I WOULD like it if I could pull off a betasuppe like style, but oh well.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Currently brainstorming for a project
|
|
|
Inane
|
|
« Reply #66 on: October 18, 2008, 12:08:43 PM » |
|
storytelling:
I'd be interested in these as well. I'd be interested in these also.
|
|
|
Logged
|
real art looks like the mona lisa or a halo poster and is about being old or having your wife die and sometimes the level goes in reverse
|
|
|
___
Vice President of Marketing, Romeo Pie Software
Level 10
|
|
« Reply #67 on: October 21, 2008, 10:46:41 PM » |
|
If anyone out there knows how to make an awesome platforming engine. Pixel perfect collisions, moving platforms that push the player and stuff, and moveable objects... I'd love to see that. (I guess specifically in Game Maker or something, although it probably doesn' t matter.)
I can find some tutorials about it, but they're usually too limited to expand upon, or it's just a huge file that's like "here you go, a platforming engine" with little to no explination of the actual engine itself (how it works, the underlying THEORIES... etc)
halp
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Xion
|
|
« Reply #68 on: October 21, 2008, 10:49:03 PM » |
|
Yesh. I have trouble with slopes and moving platforms especially. I've figured out a kind of workaround for slopes in GM, but it's highly inefficient and buggy.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
___
Vice President of Marketing, Romeo Pie Software
Level 10
|
|
« Reply #69 on: October 21, 2008, 11:16:20 PM » |
|
Yesh. I have trouble with slopes and moving platforms especially. I've figured out a kind of workaround for slopes in GM, but it's highly inefficient and buggy.
I can get slopes going fine. Up, and sticking when going down, also hitting overhead slopes in the air... but I'll be damned if I can set up a system where objects can transfer their velocities to one another and have everything work in magic harmony.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
medieval
Guest
|
|
« Reply #70 on: October 22, 2008, 05:06:10 AM » |
|
I hate game maker when things that seem so simple and should work, actually don't work.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Fishymuffin
|
|
« Reply #72 on: October 23, 2008, 04:41:11 AM » |
|
A True 3D tutorial please. The Paper Moon screenshot was just too amazing.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BenH
|
|
« Reply #73 on: October 23, 2008, 08:22:51 AM » |
|
I second the decent platform engine tutorial! My platform engines always seem to suffer from intersection problems with the ground and other obstacles, no matter how I seem to code them!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Eclipse
|
|
« Reply #74 on: October 24, 2008, 01:21:07 AM » |
|
A True 3D tutorial please. The Paper Moon screenshot was just too amazing.
do you mean 3d programming or 3d graphics? i can do both! just ask
|
|
|
Logged
|
<Powergloved_Andy> I once fapped to Dora the Explorer
|
|
|
medieval
Guest
|
|
« Reply #75 on: October 24, 2008, 03:45:15 PM » |
|
Graphics. Please do graphics. Or both.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Hedenius
|
|
« Reply #76 on: October 26, 2008, 04:11:36 AM » |
|
I'd like to see a tutorial for rocket jumping physics in a 2D Platformer.
Gang Garrison II did this well, with both rockets and grenades. If the tutorial focused on Game Maker that would be great, but not necessary.
Just the basic maths and approach would be sufficient i think.
I've tried searching the web but came up with nothing, didn't find anything on the official Game Maker forum either.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Cymon
|
|
« Reply #77 on: October 28, 2008, 09:19:38 AM » |
|
I'd like to see a tutorial for rocket jumping physics in a 2D Platformer.
Gang Garrison II did this well, with both rockets and grenades. If the tutorial focused on Game Maker that would be great, but not necessary.
Just the basic maths and approach would be sufficient i think.
I've tried searching the web but came up with nothing, didn't find anything on the official Game Maker forum either.
That's the sort of hyper specific thing that would be better for a postward on the game itself. And it depends on so many things. Generally I think it'd be better to have a 2D physics tutorial.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Hedenius
|
|
« Reply #78 on: October 28, 2008, 11:38:23 PM » |
|
You're absolutely right sir. Besides, i asked MedO (coder of GG2) and he was kind enough to provide me with what i need to get it to work in GM. The best part is that it's ridiculously easy, and i feel stupid for not being able to figure it out myself. This might be another dumb request, but perhaps some kind of a mathematics tutorial for game makeing would be neat? You describe (or list with links to explenations) the most important stuff you need to know in maths (like sin/cos/tan for example), and then show how to put it to practical use in a game by giving a few examples.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Xion
|
|
« Reply #79 on: October 28, 2008, 11:40:11 PM » |
|
I'd like that too.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|