|
ThemsAllTook
|
 |
« Reply #8280 on: May 24, 2016, 07:28:48 AM » |
|
I wasn't really gonna post this video because I put a snippet of some music on it which is copyrighted, so I kept it unlisted, but as things are, their label has found it anyway and claimed it now and put commercials on it, so I guess it's alright.
Yup, that stuff is usually automatic. Even private videos will get ContentID claims on them if they contain a match. Sometimes you'll get ads, sometimes you'll get blocked in certain regions, sometimes you'll get blocked everywhere. I believe the more damaging copyright strike will only happen when a human initiates it, though; copyright claims tend to be a mostly harmless annoyance. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
s0
|
|
« Reply #8281 on: May 24, 2016, 07:44:30 AM » |
|
how did copyright law get so dum??
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Schoq
|
|
« Reply #8282 on: May 24, 2016, 07:50:26 AM » |
|
this isn't even law, it's just google+content holders being assholes
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
♡ ♥ make games, not money ♥ ♡
|
|
|
|
s0
|
|
« Reply #8283 on: May 24, 2016, 08:05:29 AM » |
|
how did google and copyright holders get so dum??
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Schoq
|
|
« Reply #8284 on: May 24, 2016, 08:11:50 AM » |
|
u'd be dum too if it made you mad money and nobody important ever called you out in it
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
♡ ♥ make games, not money ♥ ♡
|
|
|
|
s0
|
|
« Reply #8285 on: May 24, 2016, 08:13:42 AM » |
|
Crap-it-all-ism
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
2mass
|
|
« Reply #8286 on: May 24, 2016, 08:40:05 AM » |
|
Or fuck-up'ism.. I did a remake of Purcell's Funeral Music for Queen Mary two days ago, a medieval piece I set to electronic music, alike the clockwork orange soundtrack.. I uploaded it to Hear This, and BAM.. Copyright claim.. The best bit, it was an automated claim on the band Queen's music, it wasn't even on Purcell - which would ofc have been equally nuts since it's several hundreds years old. But this automation copyright is far from flawless.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Nillo
|
|
« Reply #8287 on: May 25, 2016, 12:53:18 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
2mass
|
|
« Reply #8288 on: May 28, 2016, 06:56:24 AM » |
|
GTA IV.. Practice for drivers license..
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
s0
|
|
« Reply #8289 on: May 29, 2016, 03:13:22 AM » |
|
i've been playing a lot of mage knight solo over the past 2 months and tbh, as great as it is, i really wish another company would pick it up. so sick of wizkids' ugly miniatures and flimsy cards. the weirdest thing is, the base game and first expansion have some glaring differences in card and token colors that were never fixed in any reprints of them. how does something like that even happen?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Türbo Bröther
|
|
« Reply #8290 on: May 29, 2016, 03:14:50 AM » |
|
It happens when you cut corners to keep costs low.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
s0
|
|
« Reply #8291 on: May 29, 2016, 03:23:23 AM » |
|
well it's apparently not a problem with printing hardware seeing as it persists in reprints (from what i've seen). it would literally just be a matter of using the same image files for card and token backs across everything. what's cutting corners about that?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Türbo Bröther
|
|
« Reply #8292 on: May 29, 2016, 03:30:57 AM » |
|
It costs money to fix things. The kids probably don't care about printing errors more than they care about low quality components so why spend the extra money or the time for strenuous quality control.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
s0
|
|
« Reply #8293 on: May 29, 2016, 05:22:10 AM » |
|
It costs money to update a reprint of the base game to the more vibrant colors from the expansion?  Also mage knight (i mean the board game, not mage knight resurrection or w/e the miniatures game is called these days) is not really targeted at kids. It's a complex and long game for nerds. I.e. why it would be nice if it was handed to a publisher like fantasy flight or even the designer's own company CGE who are more competent at making components for such games. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
2mass
|
|
« Reply #8294 on: May 29, 2016, 09:48:56 PM » |
|
Now having a go in Battlefront.. But something ticks me off these games, I think you get to spent a lot of time running for the front. FrontRunner, had been a better name for it.. Here I play multiplayer..
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
s0
|
|
« Reply #8295 on: May 30, 2016, 02:42:47 AM » |
|
OK, so: I kinda didn't like the Pathfinder Adventure Card Game. It had really nice character progression mechanics but the actual moment-to-moment gameplay was grindy and the game takes waaayy too long to set up and had too much dicerolling and bookkeeping for how deep it is (which is not very deep at all).
Turns out the digital adaptation of the game, called simply Pathfinder Adventures, is actually pretty fun just by virtue of removing all the annoying shuffling. THe presentation makes it a little more thematic than its physical counterpart too.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Nillo
|
|
« Reply #8296 on: May 30, 2016, 03:57:42 AM » |
|
Yeah I feel like they had a great progression mechanic in PACG and then they wasted it on a completely tedious game. Warhammer Quest ACG is far more enjoyable imo.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
s0
|
|
« Reply #8297 on: May 30, 2016, 04:41:15 AM » |
|
Yes warhammer quest card game is great. The digital version of pathfinder is f2p though so might be worth a try.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2mass
|
|
« Reply #8299 on: May 31, 2016, 03:19:04 PM » |
|
Currently dl'ing GTAV, looking forward to try it. Gotta try the whale mod..  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Player
